Extend that pro doesn't explain how same-sex marriage should be banned because of this, rather than opposite-sex marriage or generally marriage privatization also extend that pro's own logic would mean marriage privatization is the best course, under which gay marriage would be legal. Gay marriage critics also continue to rally behind the defense of marriage act, a federal law signed by president bill clinton that defines marriage as being between a man and a woman. Calling something marriage does not make it marriage marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.
Before friday's ruling, gay marriage had already been made legal in 37 states and the district of columbia — by either legislative or voter action or by federal courts that overturned state' bans. If the distinctive sexual patterns of committed gay couples are any indication (see above), it is unlikely that homosexual marriage would domesticate men in the way that heterosexual marriage does it is also extremely unlikely that the biological effects of heterosexual marriage on men would also be found in homosexual marriage. When you review this reasoning, you have to assume the five supreme court justices have been blinded by an angel of light.
The truth is that the legalisation of gay marriage will lead to the legalisation of gay marriage dire warnings of slippery slopes are scaremongering in the countries that have so far legalised same-sex marriage, courts have always rejected calls for the legalisation of polygamy. The number of child adoptions should increase since gay couples cannot pro-create (although some might see an increase in gay adoptions as an argument against same-sex marriages) like any heterosexual couple relationship, a same-sex marriage may fuel the desire for a family. I believe that gay marriage should be banned as the bible say's righteousness lifts up a nation, but sin is a disgrace the issue will define the presidential elections because god can raise one leader or bring down another. Gay marriage should be legalized throughout the nation many gay couples have been with each other for so long that they already consider themselves married 1 in 5 of the nation's 646,000 same sex couples considers themselves married (morello.
If gay marriage should be illegal than so should women speaking in church- 1 corinthians 14:34, getting remarried after a divorce- mark 10:11-12, and so should getting tattoos- leviticus 19:28 there should not be a debate discussion on this topic because there is no debate. Gay marriage should be legalized because it is uncivilized and unmerited our civil rights and the constitution give us many liberties one of our civil liberties is the pursuit of happiness. I am not particularly supportive of gay marriage purely because marriage is given in a church and most priests would not be supportive of it making it unfair to make them associate with gay people but surely it should be legal to just exist. In response to ms sweet's post about why gay marriage should be legal there are a couple things wrong with your argument that i would like to correct first, falling in love is a choice.
On june 26, 2015, the us supreme court ruled that gay marriage is a right protected by the us constitution in all 50 states prior to their decision, same-sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and washington dc, but was banned in the remaining 13. Nature-themed arguments against gay marriage say little about the societal institution of marriage but reveal a lot about the homophobia and heterosexism of those who present such arguments. If gay marriage is legalized, gay people will marry they can adopt children, and they will be raised in a gay lifestyle when the gay children go to school, the friends they make will be encouraged to be gay.
04) straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all women are still property, blacks still can't marry whites, and divorce is still illegal 05) straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed the sanctity of britany spears' 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed. 01) being gay is not natural real americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning 02) gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall 03) legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all. Gay marriage should be legal because illegal marriage is a form of discrimination in the united states, only 25 states as well as the district of columbia have legalized same-sex marriage to date the remaining 25 currently declare gay marriage as illegal, or incorporate various forms of bans in their laws or constitutional amendments.
2) gay marriage will end up infringing on religious freedom the moment gay marriage becomes the law of the land, all sorts of first amendment freedoms involving the free exercise of people's. If the arguer should reply that marriage between two people of the same sex cannot result in the procreation of children, and so must be a kind of sham marriage, which insults or parodies, and thus demeans, the real sort of marriage, we are back to the second argument. The legal issues surrounding same-sex marriage in the united states are determined by the nation's federal system of government, in which the status of a person, including marital status, is determined in large measure by the individual states.